• Pain physician · Sep 2020

    Clinical Trial

    Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coblation of the Thoracic Nerve Root for Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia.

    • Chao Luo, Bei Yang, Li-Qiang Yang, Bai-Shan Wu, Xiao-Ping Wang, Liang-Liang He, Rui Zhao, Jia-Xiang Ni, and Yuan-Zhang Tang.
    • Department of Pain Management, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Xicheng Zone, Beijing, China; Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
    • Pain Physician. 2020 Sep 1; 23 (5): E487-E496.

    BackgroundPostherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is one of the most intractable pain disorders and often does not respond to medication, physical, and interventional procedures. Coblation technology has been demonstrated to have potential for neuralgia, but there are rare reports of the efficacy and security of coblation for PHN. The thoracic segment is the most common predilection part of PHN, so we conducted this long-term study to investigate the results of coblation for the treatment of thoracic PHN.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and security of computed tomography (CT)-guided coblation of the thoracic nerve root for treatment of PHN.Study DesignSelf before-after controlled clinical assessment.SettingDepartment of Pain Management, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University.MethodsSeventy-seven patients with thoracic PHN sustained for at least 6 months and refractory to conservative therapy were identified. Patients underwent CT-guided percutaneous coblation to ablate the thoracic nerve root for thoracic PHN. The therapeutic effects were evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), medication doses, and pain-related quality of life (QoL) scale before coblation, and at 1 week, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. Patients who achieved more than 50% pain relief were defined as responders. In addition, adverse effects were also recorded to investigate the security of this procedure.ResultsThe VAS score significantly decreased from 7.22 ± 1.15 before the coblation to 3.51 ± 1.12 (P = 0.01), 3.02 ± 1.21 (P = 0.006), 3.11 ± 2.15 (P = 0.014), and 2.98 ± 2.35 (P = 0.008) at 1 week, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure, respectively. The number of responders were 56 (77.78%), 54 (75%), 55 (76.39%), and 54 (75%) at 1 week, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure, respectively. The doses of anticonvulsants and analgesics were decreased significantly at all time points after the procedure compared with before treatment (P < 0.05). Patient responses on the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form indicated mean scores that were significantly lower than baseline across all domains of pain interference with QoL at all evaluations (P = 0.001). Most of the patients had mild numbness and it did not affect the daily activities after the procedure. No other severe adverse events occurred during or after the procedure.LimitationsA single-center study, relatively small number of patients, short duration of review of medical record, and the retrospective study.ConclusionsCT-guided percutaneous thoracic nerve root coblation is an effective and safe method for the treatment of thoracic PHN, and the procedure can also significantly improve the QoL in patients with PHN.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.