• Monica Jain, Brian T Fry, Luke W Hess, Jennifer T Anger, Bruce L Gewertz, and Ken Catchpole.
• Department of Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
• J. Surg. Res. 2016 Oct 1; 205 (2): 296-304.

BackgroundRobotic surgery offers advantages over conventional operative approaches but may also be associated with higher costs and additional risks. Analyzing surgical flow disruptions (FDs), defined as "deviations from the natural progression of an operation," can help target training techniques and identify opportunities for improvement.Materials And MethodsThirty-two robotic surgery operations were observed over a 6-wk period at one 900-bed surgical center. FDs were recorded in detail and classified into one of 11 different categories. Procedure type, robot model, and resident involvement were also recorded. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the effects of these parameters on FDs and operative duration.ResultsTwenty-one prostatectomies, eight sacrocolpopexies, and three nephrectomies were observed. The mean number of FDs was 48.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 38.6-54.8 FDs), and mean operative duration was 163 min (95% CI 148-179 min). Each FD added 2.4 min (P = 0.025) to a case's total operative duration. The number and rate of FDs were significantly affected by resident involvement (P = 0.008 and P = 0.006, respectively). Resident cases demonstrated mostly training, equipment, and robot switch FDs, whereas nonresident cases demonstrated mostly equipment, instrument changes, and external factor FDs.ConclusionsAlthough the FDs encountered in resident training are more frequent, they may not significantly increase operative duration. Other FDs, such as equipment or external factors, may be more impactful. Limiting these specific FDs should be the focus of performance improvement efforts.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

27 keywords...

hide…