• J Clin Monit Comput · Dec 2021

    A systematic review of invasive, high-fidelity pressure studies documenting the amplification of blood pressure from the aorta to the brachial and radial arteries.

    • Denis Chemla and Sandrine Millasseau.
    • Service d'explorations Fonctionnelles Multidisciplinaires bi-Site Antoine Béclère - Kremlin Bicêtre, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, APHP.Université Paris Saclay. DMU4-CORREVE and INSERM UMR_S 999, 78 rue du Gé... more néral Leclerc, 94275, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France. denis.chemla@aphp.fr. less
    • J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Dec 1; 35 (6): 1245-1252.

    AbstractIt is commonly accepted that systolic blood pressure (SBP) is significantly higher in the brachial/radial artery than in the aorta while mean (MBP) and diastolic (DBP) pressures remain unchanged. This may have implications for outcome studies and for non-invasive devices calibration. We performed a systematic review of invasive high-fidelity pressure studies documenting BP in the aorta and brachial/radial artery. We selected articles published prior to July 2015. Pressure amplification (Amp = peripheral minus central pressure) was calculated (weighted mean). The six studies retained (n = 294, 76.5% male, mean age 63.5 years) mainly involved patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). In two studies at the aortic/brachial level (n = 64), MBP and DBP were unchanged (MPAmp = 0.1 mmHg, DPAmp = -1.3 mmHg), while SBP increased (SPAmp = 4.2 mmHg; relative amplification = 3.1%). In four studies in which MBP was not documented (n = 230), brachial DBP remained unchanged and SBP increased (SPAmp = 6.6 mmHg; 4.9%). One of these four studies also reported radial SBP and DBP, not MBP (n = 12). Few high-fidelity pressure studies were found, and they have been performed mainly in elderly male patients with suspected CAD. Counter to expectations, the mean amplification of SBP from the aorta to brachial artery was < 5%. Further studies on SPAmp phenotypes (positive, null, negative) are advocated. Non-invasive device calibration assumptions were confirmed, namely unchanged MBP and DBP from the aorta to the brachial artery. Data did not allow for firm conclusions on the amount of BP changes from the aorta to the radial artery, and from the aorta to the brachial/radial arteries in other populations.© 2020. Springer Nature B.V.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…