• Bone · Jun 2012

    Micro-computed tomography assessment of the progression of fracture healing in mice.

    • Kevin R O'Neill, Christopher M Stutz, Nicholas A Mignemi, Michael C Burns, Matthew R Murry, Jeffry S Nyman, and Jonathan G Schoenecker.
    • Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
    • Bone. 2012 Jun 1; 50 (6): 1357-67.

    AbstractThe mouse fracture model is ideal for research into the pathways of healing because of the availability of genetic and transgenic mice and the ability to create cell-specific genetic mutations. While biomechanical tests and histology are available to assess callus integrity and tissue differentiation, respectively, micro-computed tomography (μCT) analysis has increasingly been utilized in fracture studies because it is non-destructive and provides descriptions of the structural and compositional properties of the callus. However, the dynamic changes of μCT properties that occur during healing are not well defined. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine which μCT properties change with the progression of fracture repair and converge to values similar to unfractured bone in the mouse femur fracture model. A unilateral femur fracture was performed in C57BL/6 mice and intramedullary fixation performed. Fractured and un-fractured contralateral specimens were harvested from groups of mice between 2 and 12 weeks post-fracture. Parameters describing callus based on μCT were obtained, including polar moment of inertia (J), bending moment of inertia (I), total volume (TV), tissue mineral density (TMD), total bone volume fraction (BV/TV), and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD). For comparison, plain radiographs were used to measure the callus diameter (D) and area (A); and biomechanical properties were evaluated using either three-point bending or torsion. The μCT parameters J, I, TV, and TMD converged toward their respective values of the un-fractured femurs over time, although significant differences existed between the two sides at every time point evaluated (p<0.05). Radiograph measurement D changed with repair progression in similar manner to TV. In contrast, BV/TV and BMD increased and decreased over time with statistical differences between callus and un-fractured bone occurring sporadically. Similarly, none of the biomechanical properties were found to distinguish consistently between the fractured and un-fractured femur. Micro-CT parameters assessing callus structure and size (J, I, and TV) were more sensitive to changes in callus over time post-fracture than those assessing callus substance (TMD, BV/TV, and BMD). Sample size estimates based on these results indicate that utilization of μCT requires fewer animals than biomechanics and thus is more practical for evaluating the healing femur in the mouse fracture model.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…