• Suneeta Gollapudy, David M Poetker, Jasmeet Sidhu, and Matthias L Riess.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
• Am J Otolaryngol. 2018 Sep 1; 39 (5): 567-569.

PurposeVisualization of the surgical field is essential for patient safety during endoscopic transsphenoidal tumor surgery. In this retrospective chart review and data analysis of patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary tumors under general anesthesia we sought to determine if total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil leads to decreased bleeding, surgical duration, time to extubation and/or length of stay in the recovery room compared to inhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane or desflurane.MethodsAfter IRB approval, chart reviews of 193 American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 to 3 patients were conducted who had undergone transsphenoidal, endonasal resections of pituitary tumors under total intravenous or inhaled anesthesia at an academic teaching hospital in the United States over a seven-year time period. One hundred four patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were further reviewed. Primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss; secondary outcomes were surgical duration, time to extubation and length of stay in the recovery room.ResultsGender, age, and Lund-Mackay-Scores were equally distributed between the two anesthetic groups. We found no significant effect of the anesthetic technique, age, gender, or Lund Mackay score on any of the primary or secondary outcomes. The only significant predictor for recovery room length of stay was intraoperative blood loss.ConclusionOur study shows no evidence that total intravenous anesthesia is superior to inhaled anesthesia or vice versa during endoscopic transsphenoidal sinus surgery with regard to relevant clinical outcome parameters.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

34 keywords...

hide…