• J P Kleinman, L S Czer, M DeRobertis, A Chaux, and G Maurer.
• Division of Cardiology Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
• Am. J. Cardiol. 1989 Nov 15; 64 (18): 1168-72.

AbstractEpicardial and transesophageal color Doppler echocardiography are both widely used for the intraoperative assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR); however, it has not been established whether grading of regurgitation is comparable when evaluated by these 2 techniques. MR jet size was quantitatively compared in 29 hemodynamically and temporally matched open-chest epicardial and transesophageal color Doppler echocardiography studies from 22 patients (18 with native and 4 with porcine mitral valves) scheduled to undergo mitral valve repair or replacement. Jet area, jet length and left atrial area were analyzed. Comparison of jet area measurements as assessed by epicardial and transesophageal color flow mapping revealed an excellent correlation between the techniques (r = 0.95, p less than 0.001). Epicardial and transesophageal jet length measurements were also similar (r = 0.77, p less than 0.001). Left atrial area could not be measured in 18 transesophageal studies (62%) due to foreshortening, and in 5 epicardial studies (17%) due to poor image resolution. Acoustic interference with left atrial and color flow mapping signals was noted in all patients with mitral valve prostheses when imaged by epicardial echocardiography, but this did not occur with transesophageal imaging. Thus, in patients undergoing valve repair or replacement, transesophageal and epicardial color flow mapping provide similar quantitative assessment of MR jet size. Jet area to left atrial area ratios have limited applicability in transesophageal color flow mapping, due to foreshortening of the left atrial borders in transesophageal views. Transesophageal color flow mapping may be especially useful in assessing dysfunctional mitral prostheses due to the lack of left atrial acoustic interference.

19 keywords...

hide…