• Am J Emerg Med · Mar 2021

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Comparison of manual and mechanical chest compression techniques using cerebral oximetry in witnessed cardiac arrests at the emergency department: A prospective, randomized clinical study.

    • Baloglu Kaya Filiz F Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Buyukdere Mah, Prof. Dr. Nabi AVCI Bulvarı No: 4, 26040 Odunpa, Nurdan Acar, Engin Ozakin, Mustafa Emin Canakci, Caglar Kuas, and Muzaffer Bilgin.
    • Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Buyukdere Mah, Prof. Dr. Nabi AVCI Bulvarı No: 4, 26040 Odunpazarı, Eskisehir, Turkey. Electronic address: fbaloglu@ogu.edu.tr.
    • Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar 1; 41: 163-169.

    AimWe aimed to compare regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) levels during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), performed either manually or using a mechanical chest compression device (MCCD), in witnessed cardiac arrest cases in the emergency department (ED), and to evaluate the effects of both the CPR methods and perfusion levels on patient survival and neurological outcomes.MethodsThis single-center, randomized study recruited patients aged ≥18 years who had witnessed a cardiopulmonary arrest in the ED. According to the relevant guidelines, CPR was performed either manually or using an MCCD. Simultaneously, rSO2 levels were continually measured with near-infrared spectroscopy.ResultsSeventy-five cases were randomly distributed between the MCCD (n = 40) and manual CPR (n = 35) groups. No significant difference in mean rSO2 levels was found between the MCCD and manual CPR groups (46.35 ± 14.04 and 46.60 ± 12.09, respectively; p = 0.541). However, a significant difference in rSO2 levels was found between patients without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and those with ROSC (40.35 ± 10.05 and 50.50 ± 13.44, respectively; p < 0.001). In predicting ROSC, rSO2 levels ≥24% provided 100% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 92-100), and rSO2 levels ≥64% provided 100% specificity (95% CI 88-100). The area under the curve for ROSC prediction using rSO2 levels during CPR was 0.74 (95% CI 0.62-0.83).ConclusionA relationship between ROSC and high rSO2 levels in witnessed cardiac arrests exists. Monitoring rSO2 levels during CPR would be useful in CPR management and ROSC prediction. During CPR, MCCD or manual chest compression has no distinct effect on oxygen delivery to the brain.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03238287.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.