• Ji Li, Zhongli Li, Ketao Wang, Chunhui Liu, Yuxing Wang, and Haoran Wang.
• Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
• Arthroscopy. 2019 Mar 1; 35 (3): 845-854.e1.

PurposeTo compare the stability and clinical outcomes of 2 medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) techniques for the treatment of recurrent lateral patellar dislocation in adults.MethodsNinety-one patients with recurrent patellar dislocation were randomly divided into 2 groups, undergoing either the traditional single-bundle transpatellar tunnel technique (group A) or the double-anchor anatomic reconstruction technique (group B). Preoperatively and at follow-up, the patellar position and rotation were evaluated by computed tomography with the congruence angle, lateral patellar angle, patellar tilt angle, and lateral patellar translation; the subjective symptoms and functional outcomes were evaluated with Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores. Clinical examinations were also performed, and redislocations or episodes of instability were recorded.ResultsPatients were followed up for a mean period of 41.11 ± 7.40 months (range, 29-62 months). At the final point, no recurrent patellar dislocations occurred, except in 4 patients with instability symptoms in group A; however, no significant difference between the 2 groups was seen (χ2 = 2.503, P = .114). The measurement results from computed tomography decreased significantly to the normal range, and no significant difference was found between the 2 groups except for the lesser patellar tilt angle in group B (t = 2.175, P = .030). The clinical examination improved significantly, no patient exhibited a positive apprehension test in either group, and the number of patients with abnormal lateral patellar translation grade and firm end point showed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (P > .05). All score systems significantly improved with no significant difference between the 2 groups except for the higher Kujala score (t = -40.635, P = .001) and International Knee Documentation Committee score (t = -33.823, P = .003) in group B.ConclusionsBoth MPFLR techniques achieved good results in the treatment of patellar dislocation. Compared with the single-bundle transpatellar tunnel technique, the double-anchor anatomic MPFLR technique may be more effective with a more congruous patellofemoral joint and better knee function.Level Of EvidenceLevel II, prospective comparative study.Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…