• Erin A Bohula, Jason N Katz, Sean van Diepen, Carlos L Alviar, Vivian M Baird-Zars, Jeong-Gun Park, Christopher F Barnett, Gurjaspreet Bhattal, Gregory W Barsness, James A Burke, Paul C Cremer, Jennifer Cruz, Lori B Daniels, Andrew DeFilippis, Christopher B Granger, Steven Hollenberg, James M Horowitz, Norma Keller, Michael C Kontos, Patrick R Lawler, Venu Menon, Thomas S Metkus, Jason Ng, Ryan Orgel, Christopher B Overgaard, Nicholas Phreaner, Robert O Roswell, Steven P Schulman, R Jeffrey Snell, Michael A Solomon, Bradley Ternus, Wayne Tymchak, Fnu Vikram, David A Morrow, and Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network.
• Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
• JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Sep 1; 4 (9): 928-935.

ImportanceSingle-center and claims-based studies have described substantial changes in the landscape of care in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). Professional societies have recommended research to guide evidence-based CICU redesigns.ObjectiveTo characterize patients admitted to contemporary, advanced CICUs.Design, Setting, And ParticipantsThis study established the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN), an investigator-initiated multicenter network of 16 advanced, tertiary CICUs in the United States and Canada. For 2 months in each CICU, data for consecutive admissions were submitted to the central data coordinating center (TIMI Study Group). The data were collected and analyzed between September 2017 and 2018.Main Outcomes And MeasuresDemographics, diagnoses, management, and outcomes.ResultsOf 3049 participants, 1132 (37.1%) were women, 797 (31.4%) were individuals of color, and the median age was 65 years (25th and 75th percentiles, 55-75 years). Between September 2017 and September 2018, 3310 admissions were included, among which 2557 (77.3%) were for primary cardiac problems, 337 (10.2%) for postprocedural care, 253 (7.7%) for mixed general and cardiac problems, and 163 (4.9%) for overflow from general medical ICUs. When restricted to the initial 2 months of medical CICU admissions for each site, the primary analysis population included 3049 admissions with a high burden of noncardiovascular comorbidities. The top 2 CICU admission diagnoses were acute coronary syndrome (969 [31.8%]) and heart failure (567 [18.6%]); however, the proportion of acute coronary syndrome was highly variable across centers (15%-57%). The primary indications for CICU care included respiratory insufficiency (814 [26.7%]), shock (643 [21.1%]), unstable arrhythmia (521 [17.1%]), and cardiac arrest (265 [8.7%]). Advanced CICU therapies or monitoring were required for 1776 patients (58.2%), including intravenous vasoactive medications (1105 [36.2%]), invasive hemodynamic monitoring (938 [30.8%]), and mechanical ventilation (652 [21.4%]). The overall CICU mortality rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 7.3%-9.3%). The CICU indications that were associated with the highest mortality rates were cardiac arrest (101 [38.1%]), cardiogenic shock (140 [30.6%]), and the need for renal replacement therapy (51 [34.5%]). Notably, patients admitted solely for postprocedural observation or frequent monitoring had a mortality rate of 0.2% to 0.4%.Conclusions And RelevanceIn a contemporary network of tertiary care CICUs, respiratory failure and shock predominated indications for admission and carried a poor prognosis. While patterns of practice varied considerably between centers, a substantial, low-risk population was identified. Multicenter collaborative networks, such as the CCCTN, could be used to help redesign cardiac critical care and to test new therapeutic strategies.

30 keywords...

hide…