• Gunes Yavuzer, Ruud Selles, Nebahat Sezer, Serap Sütbeyaz, Johannes B Bussmann, Füsun Köseoğlu, Mesut B Atay, and Henk J Stam.
• Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. gyavuzer@medicine.ankara.edu.tr
• Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar 1; 89 (3): 393-8.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of mirror therapy on upper-extremity motor recovery, spasticity, and hand-related functioning of inpatients with subacute stroke.DesignRandomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, 4-week trial, with follow-up at 6 months.SettingRehabilitation education and research hospital.ParticipantsA total of 40 inpatients with stroke (mean age, 63.2y), all within 12 months poststroke.InterventionsThirty minutes of mirror therapy program a day consisting of wrist and finger flexion and extension movements or sham therapy in addition to conventional stroke rehabilitation program, 5 days a week, 2 to 5 hours a day, for 4 weeks.Main Outcome MeasuresThe Brunnstrom stages of motor recovery, spasticity assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and hand-related functioning (self-care items of the FIM instrument).ResultsThe scores of the Brunnstrom stages for the hand and upper extremity and the FIM self-care score improved more in the mirror group than in the control group after 4 weeks of treatment (by 0.83, 0.89, and 4.10, respectively; all P<.01) and at the 6-month follow-up (by 0.16, 0.43, and 2.34, respectively; all P<.05). No significant differences were found between the groups for the MAS.ConclusionsIn our group of subacute stroke patients, hand functioning improved more after mirror therapy in addition to a conventional rehabilitation program compared with a control treatment immediately after 4 weeks of treatment and at the 6-month follow-up, whereas mirror therapy did not affect spasticity.

28 keywords...

hide…