• J. Am. Coll. Surg. · Aug 2009

    Comparative Study

    Intraperitoneal gas insufflation will be required for laparoscopic visualization in space: a comparison of laparoscopic techniques in weightlessness.

    • Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Marilyn Keaney, Leanne Kmet, Chad G Ball, Mark R Campbell, Chris Kindratsky, Michelle Groleau, Michelle Tyssen, Jennifer Keyte, and Timothy J Broderick.
    • Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Regional Trauma Services, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada. andrew.kirkpatrick@calgaryhealthregion.ca
    • J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2009 Aug 1; 209 (2): 233-41.

    BackgroundLaparoscopic surgery (LS) is contemplated during long duration space flight, but it typically necessitates intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) from insufflation to create a surgical domain. Because there are spontaneous changes in abdominal wall behavior in weightlessness (0g) that have been previously suggested to increase LS visualization, we studied the comparative laparoscopic visualization between gasless (noGAS), abdominal wall retraction (AWR), and standard 15 mmHg gas insufflation (GAS) during weightlessness.Study DesignIn-flight LS was performed on four anesthetized pigs during weightlessness obtained through parabolic flight in a research aircraft. GAS was studied during 27 parabolas and compared with 20 parabolas using AWR-LS and 12 with noGAS. Pelvic visualization was scored in real time during flight by 2 or 3 surgeons per parabola and postflight through review of compiled digital video disk (DVD) images by 29 independent reviewers. Physical measurements of the sagittal (anterior-posterior) and transverse dimensions of anesthetized pigs were recorded during 39 parabolas.ResultsDespite consistent increases in the sagittal abdominal dimension in weightlessness (GAS and noGAS), on-board scored visualization in 0g was unchanged for noGAS (p=0.78) and decreased during AWR (p=0.09), compared with 1g. Although AWR was considered feasible in 1g, spontaneous visceral movements reduced the surgical domain in 0g. Neither AWR nor noGAS was believed safe. But visualization during GAS in 0g was increased over that in 1g (p < 0.001).ConclusionsBoth noGAS and AWR are impractical in weightlessness. Gas insufflation will be required. With insufflation, visualization and perceived ability to perform LS was improved by weightlessness.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…