-
Observational Study
Emergency Coagulation Assessment During Treatment With Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Limitations and Solutions.
- Matthias Ebner, Ingvild Birschmann, Andreas Peter, Florian Härtig, Charlotte Spencer, Joachim Kuhn, Gunnar Blumenstock, Christine S Zuern, Ulf Ziemann, and Sven Poli.
- From the Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité University Medicine Berlin-Campus Virchow Klinikum, Germany (M.E.); Institute for Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Heart and Diabetes Center, Bad Oeynhausen, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany (I.B., J.K.); Department of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (M.E., F.H., C.S., U.Z., S.P.), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Angiology, Nephrology and Clinical Chemistry of the Department of Internal Medicine, German Center for Diabetes Research, and Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich (A.P.), Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (C.S.Z.), and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry (G.B.) at the University of Tübingen, Germany.
- Stroke. 2017 Sep 1; 48 (9): 2457-2463.
Background And PurposeIn patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), emergency treatment like thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke is complicated by insufficient availability of DOAC-specific coagulation tests. Conflicting recommendations have been published concerning the use of global coagulation assays for ruling out relevant DOAC-induced anticoagulation.MethodsFour hundred eighty-one samples from 96 DOAC-treated patients were tested using prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and thrombin time (TT), DOAC-specific assays (anti-Xa activity, diluted TT), and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Sensitivity and specificity of test results to identify DOAC concentrations <30 ng/mL were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to define reagent-specific cutoff values.ResultsNormal PT and aPTT provide insufficient specificity to safely identify DOAC concentrations <30 ng/mL (rivaroxaban/PT: specificity, 77%/sensitivity, 94%; apixaban/PT: specificity, 13%/sensitivity, 94%, dabigatran/aPTT: specificity, 49%/sensitivity, 91%). Normal TT was 100% specific for dabigatran, but sensitivity was 26%. In contrast, reagent-specific PT and aPTT cutoffs provided >95% specificity and a specific TT cutoff enhanced sensitivity for dabigatran to 84%. For apixaban, no cutoffs could be established.ConclusionsEven if highly DOAC-reactive reagents are used, normal results of global coagulation tests are not suited to guide emergency treatment: whereas normal PT and aPTT lack specificity to rule out DOAC-induced anticoagulation, the low sensitivity of normal TT excludes the majority of eligible patients from treatment. However, reagent-specific cutoffs for global coagulation tests ensure high specificity and optimize sensitivity for safe emergency decision making in rivaroxaban- and dabigatran-treated patients.Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT02371044 and NCT02371070.© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.