• Athina Gompou, Ioannis Griveas, Ilias Kyritsis, Ioannis Agroyannis, Manonis Tsakoniatis, and B Agroyannis.
• Nefroiatriki Renal Unit, Athens, Greece.
• Int J Artif Organs. 2009 Oct 1; 32 (10): 752-5.

AbstractThe aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the International Normalized Ratio (INR) in hemodialyzed uremic patients under treatment with oral anticoagulation drugs. Eleven out of one hundred and forty-two uremic hemodialyzed patients in our unit were included in the study. These 11 patients aged from 70 to 85 (mean: 76 years) were under oral anticoagulation treatment for protection from thromboembolic events. They received 1 mg acenocumarol daily with the therapeutic goal of achieving an INR between 2 and 2.5 units. During the last year, the number of total INR determinations was 129. Based on the INR levels, measurements were classified into three categories of anticoagulation, termed "under-anticoagulation", "target-anticoagulation", and "over-anticoagulation". The number, the percentage, and the mean value (+/-SD) of INR measurements for each category, respectively, were under-anticoagulation: 39, 30%, 1.78 +/- 0.14; target-anticoagulation: 48, 37.5%, 2.20 +/- 0.14; and over-anticoagulation: 42, 32.5%, 3.14 +/- 0.64. The mean value +/-SD of all INR determinations (n=129) was 2.34 +/-0.65. No thromboembolic or major bleeding events occurred in our patients with these INR. In conclusion, in elderly, hemodialyzed uremic patients with indications for oral anticoagulation treatment, adequate and safe INR levels can be achieved in a high proportion without serious deviations from the therapeutic goal by using low doses of drugs. Therefore, oral anticoagulation therapy should not be considered automatically contra-indicated in this patient group.

24 keywords...

hide…