• Int J Surg · Mar 2018

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of three surgical fixation methods for dual-bone forearm fractures in older children: A retrospective cohort study.

    • Wenhao Zheng, Zhenyu Tao, Chunhui Chen, Chuanxu Zhang, Hui Zhang, Zhenhua Feng, Hang Li, Liang Cheng, Leyi Cai, and Hua Chen.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.
    • Int J Surg. 2018 Mar 1; 51: 10-16.

    BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of dual ESIN (D-ESIN) fixation, hybrid fixation, and open reduction and dual plate (d-plate) fixation in the treatment of dual-bone forearm fractures in children aged 10-16 years.Materials And Methods137 patients with dual-bone forearm fractures (48 patients in the D-ESIN group, 45 patients in the hybrid group, and 44 patients in the d-plate group) were reviewed. Duration of surgery, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative times of fluoroscopy, and duration of postoperative immobilisation were recorded. Radiographic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complication rate were also recorded.ResultsSurgeries and incisions were significantly shorter, and less intraoperative blood loss occurred, in the hybrid group than the d-plate group (P < 0.001). The hybrid group was also characterised by less intraoperative fluoroscopy times and shorter duration of postoperative immobilisation compared with the D-ESIN group (P < 0.001). The union rate of the ulna at 3 months postoperatively was higher in the hybrid and d-plate groups than in the D-ESIN group (P = 0.003). The union rate of the radius was similar in all three groups (P = 0.403). No significant difference in the union rate of the radius or ulna was observed among groups at 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.052). The mean union time was notably later in the D-ESIN group than in the hybrid and d-plate groups. However, no significant difference in functional outcome or complication rate was observed among the three groups (P = 0.822 and P = 0.912).ConclusionHybrid fixation was superior in terms of the duration of surgery, intraoperative use of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative immobilisation, delayed union of the ulna, and bone union time. Therefore, hybrid fixation is a safe and effective treatment for dual-bone forearm fractures in children aged 10-16 years.Copyright © 2018 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…