-
- David W Lowenberg, Rudolf F Buntic, Gregory M Buncke, and Brian M Parrett.
- *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; †Department of Plastic Surgery, The Buncke Clinic, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
- J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Oct 1; 27 (10): 576-81.
ObjectivesTo determine long-term outcomes and costs of Ilizarov bone transport and flap coverage for lower limb salvage.DesignCase series with retrospective review of outcomes with at least 6-year follow-up.SettingAcademic tertiary care medical center.PatientsThirty-four consecutive patients with traumatic lower extremity wounds and tibial defects who were recommended amputation but instead underwent complex limb salvage from 1993 to 2005.InterventionFlap reconstruction and Ilizarov bone transport.Main Outcome MeasurementsOutcomes assessed were flap complications, infection, union, malunion, need for chronic narcotics, ambulation status, employment status, and need for reoperations. A cost analysis was performed comparing this treatment modality to amputation.ResultsThirty-four patients (mean age: 40 years) were included with 14 acute Gustilo IIIB/C defects and 20 chronic tibial defects (nonunion with osteomyelitis). Thirty-five muscle flaps were performed with 1 flap loss (2.9%). The mean tibial bone defect was 8.7 cm, mean duration of bone transport was 10.8 months, and mean follow-up was 11 years. Primary nonunion rate at the docking site was 8.8% and malunion rate was 5.9%. All patients achieved final union with no cases of recurrent osteomyelitis. No patients underwent future amputations, 29% required reoperations, 97% were ambulating without assistance, 85% were working full time, and only 5.9% required chronic narcotics. Mean lifetime cost per patient per year after limb salvage was significantly less than the published cost for amputation.ConclusionsThe long-term results and costs of bone transport and flap coverage strongly support complex limb salvage in this patient population.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.