• Arch Surg · Feb 2012

    Comparative Study

    Predicting in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing complex gastrointestinal surgery: determining the optimal risk adjustment method.

    • Jan Grendar, Abdel A Shaheen, Robert P Myers, Robyn Parker, Charles M Vollmer, Chad G Ball, May Lynn Quan, Gilaad G Kaplan, Tariq Al-Manasra, and Elijah Dixon.
    • Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
    • Arch Surg. 2012 Feb 1; 147 (2): 126-35.

    ObjectiveTo compare the performance of Charlson/Deyo, Elixhauser, Disease Staging, and All Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups (APR-DRGs) algorithms for predicting in-hospital mortality after 3 types of major abdominal surgeries: gastric, hepatic, and pancreatic resections.DesignCross-sectional nationwide sample.SettingNationwide Inpatient Sample from 2002 to 2007.PatientsAdult patients (≥18 years) hospitalized with a primary or secondary procedure of gastric, hepatic, or pancreatic resection between 2002 and 2007.Main Outcome MeasuresPredicting in-hospital mortality using the 4 comorbidity algorithms. Logistic regression analyses were used and C statistics were calculated to assess the performance of the indexes. Risk adjustment methods were then compared.ResultsIn our study, we identified 46,395 gastric resections, 18,234 hepatic resections, and 15,443 pancreatic resections. Predicted in-hospital mortality rates according to the adjustment methods agreed for 43.8% to 74.6% of patients. In all types of resections, the APR-DRGs and Disease Staging algorithms predicted in-hospital mortality better than the Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser indexes (P < .001). Compared with the Charlson/Deyo algorithm, the Elixhauser index was of higher accuracy in gastric resections (0.847 vs 0.792), hepatic resections (0.810 vs 0.757), and pancreatic resections (0.811 vs 0.741) (P < .001 for all comparisons). Higher accuracy of the Elixhauser algorithm compared with the Charlson/Deyo algorithm was not affected by diagnosis rank, multiple surgeries, or exclusion of transplant patients.ConclusionsDifferent comorbidity algorithms were validated in the surgical setting. The Disease Staging and APR-DRGs algorithms were highly accurate. For commonly used algorithms such as Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser, the latter showed higher accuracy.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.