• M Moehler, S Kanzler, M Geissler, J Raedle, M P Ebert, S Daum, D Flieger, T Seufferlein, P R Galle, T Hoehler, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie, Germany.
• Department of Medicine, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany. moehler@mail.uni-mainz.de
• Ann. Oncol. 2010 Jan 1; 21 (1): 71-7.

BackgroundThe combination of irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil demonstrates efficacy with tolerable safety in the first-line treatment of metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (mGC). This randomized phase II trial compared for the first time capecitabine with irinotecan or cisplatin in this setting.Patients And MethodsPatients were randomly assigned to receive 3-week cycles of capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2), twice daily for 14 days, with on day 1 either irinotecan 250 mg/m(2) (XI) or cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (XP). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety.ResultsOf 118 patients recruited, 112 were eligible for safety analysis and 103 for efficacy analysis. In the XI and XP treatment arms, there were no marked differences in ORR, 37.7% versus 42.0%, and median PFS, 4.2 versus 4.8 months, although median OS was longer, 10.2 versus 7.9 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicity was higher in the XP regimen for thrombocytes (18.2% versus 1.8%), nausea (23.6% versus12.3%) and vomiting (16.4% versus 1.8%) and in the XI arm for diarrhea (22.8% versus 7.3%).ConclusionThe comparable activity and safety of the XI and XP regimens establish XI as a relevant platinum-free first-line treatment choice for patients with mGC.

33 keywords...

hide…