• J Spinal Disord · Oct 1998

    Microscopic laminotomies for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

    • R Y Tsai, R S Yang, and R S Bray.
    • Garfield Medical Center, Monterey Park, California, USA.
    • J Spinal Disord. 1998 Oct 1; 11 (5): 389-94.

    AbstractIn this retrospective study, we investigated 50 patients who had undergone primary lumbar microsurgical multiple laminotomy without spinal fusion for degenerative spinal stenosis. There were 31 men and 19 women with a median age of 66 years (35-85 years). Thirteen patients had grade I spondylolisthesis, most at L4-L5 levels (11 of 13). Single-level laminotomy was done in 13 patients, two levels in 30, and three levels in 7. The median follow-up period was 27 months (range, 15-48 months). A standardized self-reported questionnaire was used for clinical outcome study. The demographic data and clinical features of these patients were analyzed for the prognostic factors. The analysis showed excellent results in 18 patients, good in 16, fair in 8, and poor in 8, whereas 30 patients reported that they were very satisfied with the surgery results, 10 were somewhat satisfied, 2 were somewhat dissatisfied, and 8 were very dissatisfied. Therefore, the satisfactory rate of the surgery was higher if judged by patient satisfaction. Among the parameters analyzed, the presence of neurogenic claudication (p = 0.008), coexisting disease (p = 0.04), and the absence of motor deficit (p = 0.03) were associated with lower total scores. In addition, longer duration of symptoms (p = 0.04) was associated with less improvement of back pain score, whereas the absence of motor deficit (p = 0.004) was associated with less improvement of leg pain score. The presence of spondylolisthesis did not affect outcomes.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…