• J Rehabil Med · Oct 2010

    Comparative Study

    Effects of training frequency on lumbar extension strength in patients recovering from lumbar dyscectomy.

    • You-Sin Kim, Jaebum Park, Jeffrey Hsu, Kyu Kwon Cho, Yoon Hyuk Kim, and Jae Kun Shim.
    • Department of Kinesiology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
    • J Rehabil Med. 2010 Oct 1; 42 (9): 839-45.

    ObjectiveTo determine the effects of lumbar extension exercise on strength, disability index, and pain scores in patients after lumbar discectomy surgery.DesignProspective comparative study.SubjectsForty patients experiencing a herniated disc at lumbar levels were divided into 4 subgroups for different training frequencies: twice/week (group 1), once/week (group 2), once/2 weeks (group 3), and no training (control).MethodsAfter completing the initial 12-week training, all subjects participated in a 12-week follow-up training.ResultsGroups 1 and 2 showed significant increases in lumbar extension strength (26 Nm and 7 Nm, respectively), while group 3 and the control group showed significant decreases in lumbar extension strength. Groups 1 and 2 showed significant decreases in disability index (1.4 and 0.8 Oswestry Disability Index points, respectively), and group 1 showed significant decreases in back and leg pain scores (both 0.5 units on a 10-cm visual analog scale).ConclusionLumbar extension strength and disability index improve with training frequencies of once and twice per week, while back and leg pain improve with a training frequency of twice per week. The clinical importance of these improvements is questionable, as the scores were already very low after the discectomy and the magnitude of absolute improvements were small.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…