-
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract · May 2015
IgE to Poppy Seed and Morphine Are Not Useful Tools to Diagnose Opiate Allergy.
- Athina L Van Gasse, Margo M Hagendorens, Vito Sabato, Chris H Bridts, Luc S De Clerck, and Didier G Ebo.
- Department of Immunology-Allergology-Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerpen, Belgium.
- J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May 1; 3 (3): 396-9.
BackgroundCorrect diagnosis of genuine IgE-mediated opiate allergy poses a significant challenge, mainly because of uncertainties associated with opiate skin testing and the unavailability of drug-specific IgE (sIgE) assays. Recently, it has been suggested that sIgE to poppy seed extract and morphine would be reliable in the diagnosis of opiate allergy. However, given the high prevalence of sIgE antibodies to these compounds in an allergic population, the predictive value of these tests leaves significant doubts.ObjectiveThis study aims at verifying the predictive value of positive poppy seed and morphine sIgE assays results.MethodsA total of 22 individuals with a positive sIgE to poppy seed or morphine were selected. All had controlled drug challenges with increasing doses of morphine and/or codeine. Of these, 18 patients had an additional basophil activation test (BAT) with morphine and codeine.ResultsNone of the 22 patients demonstrated objective or subjective symptoms on provocation with morphine and/or codeine. Regarding BAT with morphine and codeine, expression of CD63 on basophils from 14 opiate tolerant individuals remained comparable to spontaneous expression by resting cells. The remaining 4 patients were classified as nonresponders.ConclusionPositive sIgE results to poppy seed and morphine are not per se predictive for genuine opiate allergy and should not be used in isolation to diagnose morphine or codeine allergy. To avoid overdiagnosis, for the time being, we propose to supplement serological diagnosis with an oral provocation test. Whether BAT might help to discriminate between clinical reactivity and sensitization remains to be confirmed in larger collaborative studies.Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.