• Annals of surgery · Nov 2005

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Fibrin sealant versus mechanical stapling for mesh fixation during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: a randomized prospective trial.

    • Hung Lau.
    • Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Center, Tung Wah Hospital, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong SAR, China. lauh@hkucc.hku.hk
    • Ann. Surg. 2005 Nov 1; 242 (5): 670-5.

    ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcome of simultaneous bilateral endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP) using fibrin sealant (FS) and mechanical stapling for prosthetic mesh fixation.Summary Background DataSimilar efficacy of FS and mechanical stapling for mesh fixation has been demonstrated in a swine model, but no clinical trial has been conducted to compare the outcomes of TEP using these 2 fixation devices. FS adheres the prosthetic mesh without causing injury to the underlying structures. Whether the application of FS improves early postoperative outcomes, namely, reduction of postoperative pain and seroma formation, has not been examined.Patients And MethodsBetween July 2002 and February 2004, a total of 93 patients with 186 inguinal hernias who underwent bilateral TEP were randomized to have mesh fixation by either FS (n = 46) or mechanical stapling (n = 47). The primary endpoints were severity of pain, analgesic requirement, and incidence of seroma. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay, number of days required to resume normal outdoor activities and work, recurrence rate, and incidence of chronic pain.ResultsThe 2 groups were comparable in age, sex, and types of hernia. TEP were successfully performed in all patients. The FS group consumed significantly less analgesics compared with that of the staple group (P = 0.034). There was no significant difference in the postoperative pain score at rest and on coughing from the day of operation to postoperative day 6 between the groups. The incidence of seroma was significantly higher in the FS group (17.4%) than the staple group (5.3%) (P = 0.009). Length of hospital stay and time taken to resume normal activities and work were comparable between the 2 groups. With a median follow-up of 1.2 years, no recurrent hernia has been detected in either group, but the incidence of chronic pain in the staple group (20.0%) was higher than that of the FS group (13.2%) (P = 0.418).ConclusionsThis randomized prospective clinical trial demonstrated a significant reduction of analgesic consumption by using FS for mesh fixation during bilateral TEP, but it was associated with an increased incidence of postoperative seroma.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…