• Fulvio Pomero, Chiara Brignone, Cristina Serraino, Sergio Panzone, Christian Bracco, Elena Migliore, Paola Dalmasso, Perin Paolo Cavallo PC, and Luigi Maria Fenoglio.
• Internal Medicine Department, Emergency Department, Santa Croce and Carle General Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
• South. Med. J. 2011 Jun 1; 104 (6): 405-11.

ObjectivesCompressive ultrasonography (CUS) of the lower limbs is the first choice for identifying deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim of this study was to uncover clinical characteristics and CUS findings in patients with proven PE and their correlations with PE extent.MethodsA total of 524 consecutive cases of proven symptomatic PE diagnosed between January 1996 and December 2006 were reviewed.ResultsMean age was 71.06 ± 14.43 SD years; 244 patients (46.6%) were men. DVT signs or symptoms were present in 30.9% of patients and were associated with the femoral site (P = 0.029). CUS was performed in 383 patients (73.1%) and DVT was found in 75.5%. In 94.1% of patients DVT was proximal (popliteal and/or femoral), which would have been then identified by simplified CUS. CUS was performed significantly more often in presence of signs or symptoms of DVT (P < 0.001), less often in presence of medical illnesses (P = 0.040), age ≥75 years (P = 0.001) and death in hospital (P < 0.001). Signs or symptoms of DVT were predictors of positive CUS (P < 0.001), presence of medical illnesses (P = 0.020), central venous catheter (P = 0.035), death in hospital (P = 0.032) were predictors of negative CUS findings. Neither clinical findings nor CUS were associated with PE extent.ConclusionsIn patients with proven symptomatic PE, signs or symptoms of DVT are present only in 1/3 of cases and are significantly more frequent when DVT is extended to the femoral vein. Simplified CUS of the lower limbs has a high sensitivity in finding proximal DVT. CUS is not able to predict PE extent.

27 keywords...

hide…