• Respiration · Jan 2007

    Bronchoalveolar lavage in interstitial lung diseases: does the recovery rate affect the results?

    • J Schildge, C Nagel, and C Grun.
    • Abteilung Pneumologie, Medizinische Klinik, St. Vincentius-Kliniken Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany. johannes.schildge@vincentius-ka.de
    • Respiration. 2007 Jan 1; 74 (5): 553-7.

    BackgroundBronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is an established diagnostic tool in interstitial lung diseases. BAL frequently yields findings of diagnostic value and at times even confirmatory diagnostic results.ObjectivesThe present study has been designed to investigate whether the recovery rate affects BAL results relative to the instilled volume.MethodsSix hundred and eighteen patients with the following diagnoses were included into the study: 236 with sarcoidosis, 85 with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 83 with cryptogenic organizing pneumonitis, 64 with connective tissue disease affecting the lungs, 54 with respiratory bronchiolitis with interstitial lung disease, 51 with extrinsic allergic alveolitis and 45 control patients. BAL was performed during flexible bronchoscopy with an irrigation volume of 100 ml 0.9% saline solution in 5 aliquots of 20 ml each. Only patients with a recovery of at least 30 ml were evaluated. Initially, the entire patient population was analysed, followed by an analysis within the different diagnostic groups and a comparison between patients with a high (>50 ml) and low (< or =50 ml) recovery rate.ResultsThe recovery rate varied between the diagnostic groups (p < 0.001) and was negatively correlated with age (r = -0.21, p < 0.001) and smoking history (r = -0.11, p < 0.035). There were no correlations with inspiratory vital capacity (%pred.; p = 0.26) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%pred.; p = 0.15), but a positive correlation with the index (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/inspiratory vital capacity) x 100 (r = 0.23, p < 0.001). The cellular and non-cellular constituents of BAL were not affected by the recovery: cells/millilitre BAL (p = 0.71), relative proportion of macrophages (p = 0.92), lymphocytes (0 = 0.33), neutrophils (p = 0.14) and eosinophils (p = 0.11), albumin concentration (p = 0.13), and proportion of albumin in total protein (p = 0.06). The same applied for the lymphocyte surface markers CD4 (p = 0.72) and CD8 (p = 0.53). In the group with a high recovery rate, patients with sarcoidosis had a lower proportion of eosinophils (p = 0.04) and patients with cryptogenic organizing pneumonitis a higher concentration of albumin (p = 0.02) and lymphocytes (p = 0.007). Otherwise, no further differences were detected.ConclusionsThe recovery rate hardly affected the cellular and non-cellular constituents of BAL at a lower limit of 30% of the instilled volume.Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…