• J Psychiatr Res · Sep 2018

    Review Meta Analysis

    Neuroimaging hippocampal subfields in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    • Unn K Haukvik, Christian K Tamnes, Erik Söderman, and Ingrid Agartz.
    • Adult Mental Health Unit, Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway; NORMENT K.G Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: unn.haukvik@medisin.uio.no.
    • J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Sep 1; 104: 217-226.

    AbstractThe hippocampus is a complex structure consisting of subregions with specialized cytoarchitecture and functions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in psychotic disorders show hippocampal subfield abnormalities, but affected regions differ between studies. We here present an overview of hippocampal anatomy and function relevant to psychosis, and the first systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI studies of hippocampal subfield morphology in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Twenty-one MRI studies assessing hippocampal subfield volumes or shape in schizophrenia or bipolar disorder were included (n 15-887 subjects). Nine volumetric group comparison studies (total n = 2593) were included in random effects meta-analyses of group differences. The review showed mixed results, with volume reductions reported in most subfields in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Volumetric studies using ex-vivo based image analysis templates corresponded best with the shape studies, with CA1 as the most affected region. The meta-analyses showed volume reductions in all subfields in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder compared to healthy controls (all p < .005; schizophrenia: d = 0.28-0.49, bipolar disorder: d = 0.20-0.35), and smaller left CA2/3 and right subiculum in schizophrenia than bipolar disorder. In conclusion, the hippocampal subfields appear to be differently affected in psychotic disorders. However, due to the lack of control for putative confounders such as medication, alcohol and illicit substance use, and illness stage, the results from the meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution. Methodological subfield segmentation weaknesses should be addressed in future studies.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.