-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Jul 2012
Which radiographic parameters are linked to failure of a dynamic spinal implant?
- Eike Hoff, Patrick Strube, Antonius Rohlmann, Christian Gross, and Michael Putzier.
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery and Julius Wolff Institute, Klinik für Orthopädie-Charité Campus Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. eike.hoff@charite.de
- Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012 Jul 1; 470 (7): 1834-46.
BackgroundKnowledge about factors leading to failure of posterior dynamic stabilization implants is essential to design future implants and establish surgical indications. Therefore, we analyzed an implant for single-level or hybrid configuration (adjacent to spondylodesis), which was recalled due to high failure rates.Questions/PurposesWe asked: (1) Were postoperative radiographic changes linked to implant failure? (2) Were radiographic parameters different between the two configurations? And (3) was implant failure related to inferior clinical scores?MethodsThe implant was used in 18 patients with lumbar single-level spinal stenosis or with (recurrent) disc herniation and concurrent degenerative disc disease and in 22 patients with an initially degenerated segment adjacent and superior to a fusion site. We prospectively obtained preoperative and postoperative (immediate, 6-, 12- and 24-month) clinical and radiographic evaluations; 37 of the 40 patients completed the 24-month followup. Using plain and extension-flexion radiographs, we compared implant failure rates and their association with postoperative implant translation, anterior and posterior disc height, and ROM for each configuration and between configurations. We assessed associations between clinical scores (VAS pain scores for back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index) and implant failure.ResultsImplant failure occurred in 10 of the 37 implants and corresponded to greater posterior disc height (single-level only) and implant translation. Adjacent-segment ROM increases and posterior disc height decreases over time were greater with the hybrid configuration. Implant failure rate related to higher Oswestry Disability Index (single-level only) and higher back pain scores.ConclusionsImplant translation is associated with failure likely due to insufficient resistance to shear forces. Load transfer may cause progressive degeneration in the dynamic and adjacent segments, especially in the hybrid configuration.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.