• Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med · Feb 2017

    Observational Study

    Ultrasonographic diaphragmatic excursion is inaccurate and not better than the MRC score for predicting weaning-failure in mechanically ventilated patients.

    • Cédric Carrie, Chloé Gisbert-Mora, Eline Bonnardel, Bernard Gauche, Matthieu Biais, Frédéric Vargas, and Gilles Hilbert.
    • Critical Care Department, Centre Hospitalier Robert Boulin, 33500 Libourne, France. Electronic address: cedric.carrie@ch-libourne.fr.
    • Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017 Feb 1; 36 (1): 9-14.

    PurposeTo assess the ability of diaphragmatic ultrasound (US) to predict weaning failure in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing a first spontaneous breathing trial (SBT).MethodsDuring a 4-month period, 67 consecutive patients eligible for a first SBT underwent US measurements of maximal diaphragmatic excursion (MDE) by a right anterior subcostal approach. Weaning failure was defined as either the failure of SBT or the need for resumption of ventilatory support for acute respiratory failure or death within 48h following successful extubation. The accuracy of diaphragmatic ultrasound and the Medical Research Council (MRC) score when predicting weaning failure was assessed via a receiver operating curve analysis.ResultsThe feasibility rate for the ultrasound measurements was 63%. Mean values of MDE were significantly higher in patients who succeeded at their first weaning attempt (4.1±2.1 versus 3±1.8cm, P=0.04). Using a threshold of MDE≤2.7cm, the sensitivity and specificity of diaphragmatic ultrasound in predicting weaning failure were 59% [39-77%] and 71% [57-82%] with an AUC at 0.65 [0.51-0.78]. There was no significant difference between MDE values and MRC scores for predicting weaning failure (P=0.73).ConclusionA decrease in MDE values may be associated with an unfavourable weaning outcome. Diaphragmatic excursion measured by ultrasound is however unable by itself to predict weaning failure at the bedside of patients undergoing a first spontaneous breathing trial and does not provide any additional value compared to the MRC score.Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.