• Hans Peter Richter, Jens C Kubitz, and Christian Petersen.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Center of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. hans.peter.richter@gmx.net
• J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth.. 2011 Dec 1;25(6):1051-5.

ObjectiveAcute right ventricular failure (RVF) is a life-threatening condition. This study investigated whether the combination of central venous pressure (CVP) and left ventricular functional preload parameters, such as stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV), can be used for the detection of acute RVF and for guidance of volume therapy.Design And SettingExperimental study in a university laboratory.ParticipantsFifteen anesthetized and ventilated pigs.Measurements And Main ResultsFor the induction of RVF, mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) was increased by 50% with a continuous infusion of a thromboxane-A(2) analog (U46619). Then, blood removal (300 mL) and retransfusion (blood 200 mL + colloid solution 200 mL) were performed. An analysis of volume responders and nonresponders was implemented. Increasing MPAP (25.1 to 37.4 mmHg) led to decreases in mean arterial pressure (72.2 to 60.1 mmHg) and cardiac output (2.8 to 2.3 L/min, p < 0.05). CVP (11.3 to 12.6 mmHg), PPV (13% to 17%), and SVV (11 to 14%) increased significantly (p < 0.05). During volume removal, MPAP (37.4 to 34.1 mmHg), mean arterial pressure (60.1 to 53.2 mmHg), and cardiac output (2.3 to 2.1 L/min) decreased (p < 0.05), whereas PPV and SVV remained unchanged. During volume loading, CVP increased in volume responders and nonresponders; however, PPV decreased in responders only.ConclusionsIncreases of CVP and SVV or PPV are suspicious for RVF. However, SVV and PPV fail to predict volume responsiveness in RVF. Changes in SVV and PPV during a volume-loading maneuver can be used to assess volume responsiveness.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

34 keywords...

hide…