• Yoshio Haga, Nobutomo Miyanari, Tadateru Takahashi, Shoichiro Koike, Ryozo Kobayashi, Hiroya Mizusawa, Chikaaki Nakamichi, and Mataro Goto.
• From the 1 National Hospital Organization (NHO) Kumamoto Medical Center , Kumamoto.
• Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2013 Oct 1; 45 (10): 773-9.

BackgroundRisk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) may change over time with progress in infection control. This study was undertaken to explore the current risk factors for CRBSIs in hospitalized patients.MethodsAdult patients with non-tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) in 12 Japanese referral hospitals were prospectively enrolled between December 2009 and January 2012. Patients were monitored for CRBSIs for up to 8 weeks from CVC insertion; data were collected regarding patient characteristics, the purpose of CVC insertion, insertion methods, mechanical complications during insertion, and post-insertion catheter care.ResultsA total of 892 patients were enrolled in this study. The overall incidence of CRBSIs was 0.40 infections per 1000 catheter-days. Univariate analysis using the Fisher's exact test identified one of the participating hospitals (hospital A; p < 0.001), internal jugular vein catheterization (IJVC) (p = 0.0013), not using maximal sterile barrier precautions (p = 0.030), and the Seldinger technique for catheter insertion (p = 0.025) as significant risk factors for CRBSI. After excluding data from hospital A, only IJVC remained a significant risk factor for CRBSI (p = 0.025). The cumulative probability of remaining without CRBSI was significantly lower in patients with IJVCs than in patients with other catheter routes (p < 0.001; log-rank test). Similarly, the cumulative probability of remaining without catheter removal due to a suspected infection was significantly lower in patients with IJVCs (p = 0.034; log-rank test).ConclusionsThe current study suggests that IJVC might be a risk factor for CRBSI under current infection control conditions.

22 keywords...

hide…