-
- E H Huang, R L Whelan, N R Gleason, J S Maeda, M B Terry, S W Lee, A I Neugut, and K A Forde.
- Department of Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. eh257@columbia.edu
- Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul 1; 15 (7): 646-8.
BackgroundAlthough adenomatous polyps have been established clearly as precursor lesions for most cases of colorectal cancer, the role, if any, of hyperplastic polyps remains uncertain. The aim of the current study was to determine whether a patient with an index finding of hyperplastic polyp on colonoscopy is at increased risk for adenomatous polyps.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the records of a single surgeon's colonoscopic experience over a 20-year period (June 1973 to December 1994). Patients found to have hyperplastic lesions on index colonoscopy were compared with those who had "clean" index colonoscopies. The two groups were compared for the subsequent diagnosis of adenomatous polyps on follow-up colonoscopies. Those with cancer or adenomas at index colonoscopy or in their history were excluded. We used Cox proportional hazard modeling with subsequent adenoma or cancer diagnosis at follow-up colonoscopy as the outcome, controlling for age and gender.ResultsWe identified 42 patients for whom hyperplastic polyps were the only colorectal neoplasms found on the index examination, in contrast to 362 control patients who had a "clean" index examination. In this cohort study, patients found to have only hyperplastic polyps on initial examination had a rate of subsequent adenoma diagnoses (42%) twice that of patients with a clean initial colonoscopy (21%). Mean follow-up time was 4.3 years. The relative rate ratio was 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.4).ConclusionsThis study suggests that patients found to have hyperplastic polyps on initial colonoscopic examination may have twice the risk of adenomas on follow-up colonoscopy, as compared with those who have clean initial examinations. If this finding is borne out in larger prospective studies, surveillance strategies may need to be modified accordingly.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.