-
Comparative Study
Comparison of nasopharyngeal aspirate with flocked swab for PCR-detection of respiratory viruses in children.
- Hege Smith Tunsjø, Are Stuitz Berg, Christopher Steven Inchley, Irmelin Kittelsen Røberg, and Truls Michael Leegaard.
- Genetic unit, Department of Multidisciplinary Laboratory medicine and Biochemistry, Division of Diagnostics and Technology, Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway.
- APMIS. 2015 Jun 1; 123 (6): 473-7.
AbstractFast- and high-throughput molecular workflows require sample matrices to be suitable for automation. Respiratory swabs are better suited for this purpose compared to the more viscous nasopharyngeal aspirates. Samples collected by nasopharyngeal aspiration and nasopharyngeal flocked swab from 81 children were compared for detection and recovery of respiratory viruses. Using real-time RT-PCR, no statistically significant differences in virus detection between the two sample types were found, supporting the use of flocked swabs in children aged one month to two years. © 2015 APMIS. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.