• J Rheumatol · Apr 2014

    Review

    Reconciling healthcare professional and patient perspectives in the development of disease activity and response criteria in connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung diseases.

    • Lesley Ann Saketkoo, Shikha Mittoo, Sid Frankel, Daphne LeSage, Catherine Sarver, Kristine Phillips, Vibeke Strand, Eric L Matteson, OMERACT Connective Tissue Disease–Interstitial Lung Diseases Working Group, and OMERACT Connective Tissue Disease-Interstitial Lung Diseases Working Group.
    • From the Louisiana State University (LSU) Scleroderma and Sarcoidosis Patient Care and Research Center, LSU Interstitial Lung Disease Program, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA; University of Toronto, Interstitial Lung Disease Program, University Health Network/Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario; Faculty of Social Work, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Louisiana Office of Public Health, Department of Health and Human Services, New Orleans, Louisiana; Division of Rheumatology/Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Immunology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California; and Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
    • J Rheumatol. 2014 Apr 1; 41 (4): 792-8.

    AbstractInterstitial lung diseases (ILD), including those related to connective tissue disease (CTD), and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) carry high morbidity and mortality. Great efforts are under way to develop and investigate meaningful treatments in the context of clinical trials. However, efforts have been challenged by a lack of validated outcome measures and by inconsistent use of measures in clinical trials. Lack of consensus has fragmented effective use of strategies in CTD-ILD and IPF, with a history of resultant difficulties in obtaining agency approval of treatment interventions. Until recently, the patient perspective to determine domains and outcome measures in CTD-ILD and IPF had never been applied. Efforts described here demonstrate unequivocally the value and influence of patient involvement on core set development. Regarding CTD-ILD, this is the first OMERACT working group to directly address a manifestation/comorbidity of a rheumatic disease (ILD) as well as a disease not considered rheumatic (IPF). The OMERACT 11 proceedings of the CTD-ILD Working Group describe the forward and lateral process to include both the medical and patient perspectives in the urgently needed identification of a core set of preliminary domains and outcome measures in CTD-ILD and IPF.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.