• Academic radiology · Nov 2013

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis and dual-energy subtraction radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: initial evaluations in human clinical cases.

    • Tsutomu Gomi, Miwako Nozaki, Tohoru Takeda, Tokuo Umeda, Kazutoshi Takahashi, and Masahiro Nakajima.
    • School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kitasato 1-15-1, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0373, Japan. Electronic address: gomi@kitasato-u.ac.jp.
    • Acad Radiol. 2013 Nov 1; 20 (11): 1357-63.

    Rationale And ObjectivesTo compare initial evaluations of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis (DES-DT) and dual-energy subtraction radiography (DES-R) for detection of pulmonary nodules.Materials And MethodsDES-DT and DES-R systems with pulsed x-rays and rapid kV switching were used to evaluate pulmonary nodules (>4-6 mm, 2 nodules; >6-8 mm, 2 nodules; >8 mm, 32 nodules). Multidetector computed tomography was used as a reference. A filtered back-projection algorithm was used to reconstruct low-voltage (60 kVp), high-voltage (120 kVp), and soft-tissue or bone-subtracted tomograms of the desired layer thicknesses from the image data acquired during a single tomographic scan. DES-R images were processed from the low- and high-voltage images. To detect the pulmonary nodules, we used both systems to examine 36 patients with and 36 patients without pulmonary nodules. Two radiologists and three doctors of pulmonary medicine (average experience, 18 years) performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the results.ResultsThe ROC analysis results suggested that the detection ability was significantly better for DES-DT than for DES-R (P < .0001; 95% confidence interval: DES-DT, 0.94 [0.83-0.99]; DES-R, 0.76 [0.68-0.85]; sensitivity: DES-DT, 87.7 ± 2.9%; DES-R, 53.8 ± 3.5%; specificity: DES-DT, 78.3 ± 5.6%; DES-R, 78.4 ± 3.4%; accuracy: DES-DT, 83.1 ± 3.8%, DES-R, 66.1 ± 2.0%). When the nodules were no longer superimposed over the normal structures, their characteristics and distribution could be observed much more clearly.ConclusionCompared with DES-R, DES-DT provided greater sensitivity for detection of pulmonary nodules, particularly for the larger ones.Copyright © 2013 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.