• Am. J. Kidney Dis. · Oct 2020

    Developing Consensus-Based Outcome Domains for Trials in Children and Adolescents With CKD: An International Delphi Survey.

    • Charlotte Logeman, Chandana Guha, Martin Howell, Camilla S Hanson, Jonathan C Craig, Susan Samuel, Michael Zappitelli, Mina Matsuda-Abedini, Allison Dart, Susan Furth, Allison Eddy, Jaap Groothoff, Hui-Kim Yap, Detlef Bockenhauer, Aditi Sinha, Stephen I Alexander, Stuart L Goldstein, Debbie S Gipson, Mini Michael, Amanda Walker, Joshua Kausman, Segolene Gaillard, Justine Bacchetta, Michelle N Rheault, Bradley A Warady, Alicia Neu, Martin Christian, Steven McTaggart, Isaac Liu, Sharon Teo, Benedicte Sautenet, Talia Gutman, Simon Carter, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, and Allison Tong.
    • Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
    • Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2020 Oct 1; 76 (4): 533-545.

    Rationale & ObjectiveThe inconsistency in outcomes reported and lack of patient-reported outcomes across trials in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) limits shared decision making. As part of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG)-Kids initiative, we aimed to generate a consensus-based prioritized list of critically important outcomes to be reported in all trials in children with CKD.Study DesignAn online 2-round Delphi survey in English, French, and Hindi languages.Settings & ParticipantsPatients (aged 8-21 years), caregivers/family, and health care professionals (HCPs) rated the importance of outcomes using a 9-point Likert scale (7-9 indicating critical importance) and completed a Best-Worst Scale.Analytical ApproachWe assessed the absolute and relative importance of outcomes. Comments were analyzed thematically.Results557 participants (72 [13%] patients, 132 [24%] caregivers, and 353 [63%] HCPs) from 48 countries completed round 1 and 312 (56%) participants (28 [40%] patients, 64 [46%] caregivers, and 220 [56%] HCPs) completed round 2. Five outcomes were common in the top 10 for each group: mortality, kidney function, life participation, blood pressure, and infection. Caregivers and HCPs rated cardiovascular disease higher than patients. Patients gave lower ratings to all outcomes compared with caregivers/HCPs except they rated life participation (round 2 mean difference, 0.1), academic performance (0.1), mobility (0.4), and ability to travel (0.4) higher than caregivers and rated ability to travel (0.4) higher than HCPs. We identified 3 themes: alleviating disease and treatment burden, focusing on the whole child, and resolving fluctuating and conflicting goals.LimitationsMost participants completed the survey in English.ConclusionsMortality, life participation, kidney function, and blood pressure were consistently highly prioritized by patients, caregivers, and HCPs. Patients gave higher priority to some lifestyle-related outcomes compared with caregivers/HCPs. Establishing critically important outcomes for all trials in children with CKD may improve consistent reporting of survival, kidney health, and clinical and life impact outcomes that are meaningful for decision making.Copyright © 2020 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.