• K P Schellhas, T A Garvey, B A Johnson, P J Rothbart, and S R Pollei.
• Center for Diagnostic Imaging, St. Louis Park, MN 55416, USA.
• AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Feb 1; 21 (2): 269-75.

Background And PurposePrevious authors have described the locations of provoked responses to cervical diskography from C3-C4 to C6-C7, but we have found no description of the findings at C2-C3. This study was undertaken to analyze the sensations provoked during cervical diskography at C2-C3 and to compare the results with those provoked at C3-C4 and C4-C5.MethodsThe locations of diskographically provoked responses from 40 consecutive patients who had undergone C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5 diskography were analyzed. Only intensely painful (> or = 7/10) and concordant responses were considered. Disk morphology on MR images and diskograms was also compared with the provoked responses.ResultsEighteen subjects described either unilateral (n = 10) or bilateral (usually asymmetric) (n = 8) concordant pain at the craniovertebral junction in response to C2-C3 diskography. Nine subjects described either unilateral (n = 5) or bilateral (n = 4) neck pain during injection. Cephalalgia or head pain was provoked in 19 subjects, seven bilaterally. Four subjects described either unilateral (n = 3) or bilateral (n = 1) trapezius muscle and/or shoulder pain. Preliminary MR studies were not helpful, as most C2-C3 disks either appeared normal or exhibited nonspecific signs of degeneration. All disks exhibited either fissuring or extradiskal leakage of contrast material at diskography, regardless of the response provoked.ConclusionDiskography at C2-C3 and C3-C4 frequently produces pain sensations in the head, craniovertebral junction, and neck. There is no correlation between C2-C3 disk morphology and the diskographically provoked response.

18 keywords...

hide…