• Huan Liu, Hongwei Wang, Jun Liu, Changqing Li, Yue Zhou, and Liangbi Xiang.
• Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.
• J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 8; 14 (1): 122.

BackgroundTo compare the biomechanical characteristics of different posterior intermediate screw fixation techniques (ISFTs) with hybrid monoaxial pedicle screws (Mps) and polyaxial pedicle screws (Pps) used in thoracolumbar burst fractures.MethodsFixation techniques are compared with regard to the von Mises stress (VMS) of the instrumentations and intradiscal pressures (IDPs) of the adjacent segments by finite element method (FEM).ResultsThe redistributed ROM of the fixation models with Pps fixed at the lowest segment was twice of the other fixation models in flexion and extension. The largest value of maximal VMS of a pedicle screw was located at the lowest pedicle screws when Mps are fixed at the lowest segment. The largest value of maximal VMS of the rods was decreased when more Pps are fixed at the models. Maximal IDPs of the upper adjacent segments were all larger than those of the lower adjacent segments. The maximal IDPs of the fixation model with MPs fixed at the lowest segment were larger than the other fixation models in flexion and extension.ConclusionsPolyaxial pedicle screws could be placed at the upper or the median segment for the facilitated efficient application of the connecting rod. We should focus on the adjacent segmental degeneration especially the upper adjacent segment in the fixation model with Mps fixed at the lowest segment.

28 keywords...

hide…