• Spine · Jan 2007

    Review

    The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

    • Jan-Willem van Geen, Michel J A Edelaar, Miriam Janssen, and Jacques Th M van Eijk.
    • Health Care Studies/Medical Sociology, Rehabilitation Center Heliomare, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
    • Spine. 2007 Jan 15; 32 (2): 249-55.

    Study DesignSystematic review of randomized controlled trials.ObjectivesTo determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.Summary Of Background DataChronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available.MethodsElectronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality.ResultsFive of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention.ConclusionIn the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.