• J Shoulder Elbow Surg · Oct 2018

    Comparative Study

    Which additional augmented fixation procedure decreases surgical failure after proximal humeral fracture with medial comminution: fibular allograft or inferomedial screws?

    • Doo-Sup Kim, Doo-Hyung Lee, Yong-Min Chun, and Sang-Jin Shin.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea.
    • J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Oct 1; 27 (10): 1852-1858.

    BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiologic results between treatment with locking plate fixation and fibular allograft augmentation (FA) and treatment with locking plate fixation and additional inferomedial screws (IMSs) in 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures with medial comminution in geriatric patients.MethodsWe enrolled 164 patients with 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures with medial comminution who were treated with locking plates. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to additional augmented fixation procedures. The IMS group was composed of patients treated with additional IMSs (80 patients), whereas the FA group was treated with an additional fibular allograft (84 patients). On the basis of fracture classification, the IMS group was subdivided into those with 3-part fractures (52 patients) and those with 4-part fractures (28 patients) and the FA group was subdivided into those with 3-part fractures (55 patients) and those with 4-part fractures (29 patients). Clinical and radiographic results were compared and analyzed.ResultsIn patients with 3-part fractures, no differences in clinical outcomes were found regardless of additional procedures. However, the FA group showed superior clinical outcomes in patients with 4-part fractures (P = .038 for Constant score and P = .045 for visual analog scale score). The postoperative neck-shaft angle was maintained in the FA group compared with the IMS group with both fracture types at the last follow-up (P = .048 for IMS vs FA with 3-part fractures and P = .023 for IMS vs FA with 4-part fractures). The number of complications was significantly higher in the IMS group (5.5%) than in the FA group (1.2%) (P = .001).ConclusionAn FA technique is considered a primary additional procedure for medial support in patients with 4-part proximal humeral fractures involving medial metaphyseal comminution when treated with locking plate fixation.Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…