• J Manipulative Physiol Ther · Jan 1998

    A pilot study of the purchase of manipulation services for acute low back pain in the United Kingdom.

    • N Scheurmier and A C Breen.
    • Wiltshire Health Authority, England.
    • J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Jan 1; 21 (1): 14-8.

    BackgroundThe purchasing arrangements for acute low back pain recommended to UK health ministers by the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) in 1994 as a cost-neutral way of reducing back pain disability have not been tested in practice.ObjectiveTo test the CSAG's recommendations in primary care, studying their cost implications and identifying the professional relationships between general practitioners (GPs) and manipulation practitioners.DesignRetrospective and prospective observational study with cohorts balanced for similar features in terms of age, gender, diagnosis, severity and work loss at entry point.ParticipantsOne hundred and ninety-four retrospective patients with acute low back pain presenting to 11 GP practices between July and October 1995. Three hundred and forty-four prospective patients with the complaint presenting to the same practices between November 1995 and March 1996. Referrals to local chiropractic, osteopathic and manipulation physiotherapy practices as well as to usual secondary care services.Outcome MeasuresWaiting time for first attendances, sickness certification, number of consultations, drug use and costs, recovery time, x-ray utilization, cost of care.Main ResultsSubstantial shift of referrals to manipulation practitioners under the scheme. Prospective patients had fewer referrals to secondary care than retrospective patients, fewer GP consultations, less drug use, fewer certified sickness days. Prospective patients had shorter waiting times to be seen by manipulating physiotherapists. Chiropractors used X-rays more often than other practitioners. Demonstrable savings in sickness incapacity benefits were evident by following CSAG recommendations.ConclusionGPs complied with CSAG management recommendations when funding of manipulation services was made available. Implementation was associated with better outcomes generally. A fully funded study including chronic back patients is justified.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…