• Health Quality Ontario .
• Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2018 Jan 1; 18 (8): 1-110.

BackgroundOsteoarthritis is a chronic disorder and the most common form of arthritis. The joints most commonly affected are the hip and knee. The progression of osteoarthritis results in the breakdown of tissues and cartilage and the loss of joint function, causing symptoms such as pain, stiffness, reduced physical function, and limited movement. Although there is no cure for osteoarthritis, treatment options are available to manage symptoms and optimize quality of life. Clinical guidelines recommend education, exercise, and weight loss (when necessary) as the first line of treatment.MethodsWe conducted a health technology assessment, which included an evaluation of the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of a structured education and neuromuscular exercise program for the management of hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. We also assessed the budget impact of publicly funding such a program, and we spoke with people with osteoarthritis to gain an understanding of their preferences and values. We performed a systematic review of the clinical and economic literature published between January 1, 2008, and October 4, 2017. We also performed a grey literature search of health technology assessment websites. We assessed the risk of bias of each study, and we assessed the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a structured education and neuromuscular exercise program for adults with knee osteoarthritis, we conducted a cost-utility analysis from the perspective of the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. We also estimated the budget impact of publicly funding such a program in Ontario over the next 5 years. To contextualize the potential value of this type of program as a treatment option, we spoke with people with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis.ResultsTen studies met our inclusion criteria for the clinical evidence review. Compared with usual care, a structured education and neuromuscular exercise program showed statistically significant short-term improvements in pain (GRADE low) and physical function (GRADE moderate), as well as statistically significant long-term improvements in performing activities of daily living (GRADE moderate) and in quality of life (GRADE moderate). The short-term improvements in pain and physical function appeared to be sustained into the medium term. Compared with patient education, a structured education and neuromuscular exercise program showed statistically significant short-term improvements in pain (GRADE low) and physical function (GRADE low) and sustained long-term improvement in physical function.Our primary economic evaluation showed that, compared with usual care, a group-based structured education and neuromuscular exercise program consisting of two educational sessions and 24 exercise sessions for the management of knee osteoarthritis was associated with an incremental cost of $719 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $410-$1,118) and an incremental quality-adjusted survival of 0.03 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (95% CI: -0.006 to 0.06), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $23,967 per QALY gained. The budget impact of publicly funding a group-based structured education and neuromuscular exercise program consisting of two educational sessions and 24 exercise sessions would range from $21.4 million to $91.6 million per year over the next 5 years. The budget impact of publicly funding a program consisting of two educational sessions and 12 exercise sessions would range from $12.4 million to $53.2 million per year over the next 5 years.People with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis with whom we spoke reported on the negative impact of osteoarthritis on their physical functioning and quality of life. Those with experience of a structured education and neuromuscular exercise program reported favourably on the program, stating they felt that participation in the program had strengthened their muscles and reduced the negative impact of their symptoms. The cost of such programs was reported as a barrier to access.ConclusionsThere is moderate-quality evidence that, compared with usual care, a structured education and neuromuscular exercise program improves physical function, quality of life, and the ability to perform activities of daily living. There is low-quality evidence that, compared with usual care, this type of program improves pain. Low-quality evidence suggests that, compared with patient education, a structured education and neuromuscular exercise program improves pain and physical function.A group-based structured education and neuromuscular exercise program may be cost-effective for the nonsurgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Publicly funding a group-based structured education and neuromuscular exercise program for hip and/or knee osteoarthritis in Ontario would lead to additional costs to the health system of $21.4 million to $91.6 million per year over the next 5 years. If the program could be delivered with a smaller number of 12 exercise sessions, the budget impact would be reduced to between $12.4 million and $53.2 million over the next 5 years.Structured education and neuromuscular exercise programs are perceived favourably by people with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. However, the cost of such programs may be a barrier to access.

16 keywords...

hide…