• Zentralbl Chir · Sep 2009

    [Liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases--is hepatic resection justified as part of the oncosurgical treatment?].

    • F Lehner, W Ramackers, H Bektas, T Becker, and J Klempnauer.
    • Medizinsche Hochschule Hannover, Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, Hannover, Germany. lehner.frank@mh-hannover.de
    • Zentralbl Chir. 2009 Sep 1; 134 (5): 430-6.

    BackgroundThe value of hepatic resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases remains controversial and is still under debate. Although there are numerous reported cases, the results are inconsistent due to the heterogeneity of the enrolled patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the utility of liver resection in the long-term outcome of patients with non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases and to define prognostic factors predicting long-term survivors.MethodsThe records of patients undergoing liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases between January 1994 and December 2008 were analysed. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics, type of resection, long-term outcome and prognostic factors were analysed.ResultsBetween 1994 and December 2008 273 liver resections were performed in 242 patients because of non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases. The morbidity rate was 20.9 % (n = 57), the mortality rate was 2.2 % (n = 6). Patient survival at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years was 76 %, 42 %, 28 % and 13 %, respectively. In multivariate analyses margin status (R0 vs. R2; p = 0.001) and time to metastases (synchronous vs. metachronous) were predictors of survival. Patient's age, type of resection, number and size of metastases did not achieve significance. According to the primary tumour site, patient survival differed. Patients with urological and gynaecological primary tumours fared better whereas patients with liver metastases from gastrointestinal primary tumours did worse without reaching statistical significance.ConclusionLiver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases is safe and effective. For individual patients with controlled systemic disease, liver resection can offer appropriate survival rates and should be a part of the onco-surgical treatment.(c) Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart-New York.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.