• Nicole Marsh, Joan Webster, Emily Larson, Marle Cooke, Gabor Mihala, and Claire M Rickard.
• 1Nursing & Midwifery Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
• J Hosp Med. 2018 Feb 1; 13 (2): 83-89.

BackgroundAlmost 70% of hospitalized patients require a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV), yet up to 69% of PIVs fail prior to completion of therapy.ObjectiveTo identify risk factors associated with PIV failure.DesignA single center, prospective, cohort study.SettingMedical and surgical wards of a tertiary hospital located in Queensland, Australia.ParticipantsAdult patients requiring a PIV.MeasurementsDemographic, clinical, and potential PIV risk factors were collected. Failure occurred if the catheter had complications at removal.ResultsWe recruited 1000 patients. Catheter failure occurred in 512 (32%) of 1578 PIVs. Occlusion/infiltration risk factors included intravenous (IV) flucloxacillin (hazard ratio [HR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-3.31), 22-gauge PIVs (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.00), and female patients (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.10-2.00). Phlebitis was associated with female patients (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.40-2.35), bruised insertion sites (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.26-3.71), IV flucloxacillin (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.26-3.21), and dominant side insertion (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.77). Dislodgement risks were a paramedic insertion (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.03-3.06).Each increase by 1 in the average number of daily PIV accesses was associated (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20)-(HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21) with occlusion/infiltration, phlebitis and dislodgement. Additional securement products were associated with less (HR 0.32, 95% C-0.46)-(HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.82) occlusion/infiltration, phlebitis and dislodgement.ConclusionModifiable risk factors should inform education and inserter skill development to reduce the currently high rate of PIV failure.© 2017 Society of Hospital Medicine

28 keywords...

hide…