-
- G D'Ettorre, A Caroli, V Pellicani, and G Ceccarelli.
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Health Unit of Occupational Prevention and Protection, Local Health Authority, Brindisi, Italy.
- Ann Ig. 2020 Mar 1; 32 (2): 99-108.
BackgroundThe risk assessment of workplace violence in emergency departments represents a global challenge for both healthcare organizations and workers. Recent studies have revealed increased rates of workplace violence towards physicians and nurses employed in emergency departments and have shown that type II is the most common typology of workplace violence among the four types of workplace violence defined by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The present study aimed to develop a methodological technique for a preliminary assessment of type II workplace violence risk in emergency departments.MethodsThe Delphi method was used to develop a questionnaire entitled Emergency Department Workplace Violence-Questionnaire which was composed of two sections: 1) sentinel events, and 2) risk factors. The authors used the Emergency Department Workplace Violence-Questionnaire to evaluate the workplace violence risk among physicians and nurses employed in a hospital emergency department.ResultsThe Emergency Department Workplace Violence-Questionnaire was composed of 21 items. The sentinel events section consisted of three company indicators related to workplace violence and identified three areas of risk. The risk factors section identified 18 organizational and environmental factors associated with workplace violence occurrence. The assessment of workplace violence risk in the targeted hospital emergency departments, obtained through the use of the Emergency Department Workplace Violence-Questionnaire, showed a medium risk of workplace violence for both physicians (score=18) and nurses (score=19.5); the analysis found objective risk factors associated with workplace violence and led us to suggest organizational and environmental interventions for reducing the sources of risk among healthcare workers and to prioritize the interventions targeted at the problematical issues detected by the Emergency Department Workplace Violence-Questionnaire. The corrective interventions were focused on an engineering level (i.e. absence of areas for patients/clients to de-escalate, absence of alarm systems) and regarding the organizational environment (i.e. absence of a Workplace Violence Task Force to assess workplace violence risk and develop solutions, working alone).ConclusionThe proposed questionnaire proved to be a valid, structured, and reliable tool for assessing the risk of workplace violence in the targeted emergency departments and allowed for the identification of improvement actions targeted at specific critical issues which could be minimized through strategic interventions.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.