-
Journal of critical care · Feb 2021
Meta AnalysisClassification and differential effectiveness of goal-directed hemodynamic therapies in surgical patients: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Xu Zhao, Li Tian, Alexandria Brackett, Feng Dai, Junmei Xu, and Lingzhong Meng.
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America. Electronic address: xu.zhao@csu.edu.cn.
- J Crit Care. 2021 Feb 1; 61: 152-161.
PurposeTo investigate the most effective goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) in surgical patients.MethodsGDHTs were classified as methods for intravascular volume, preload, stroke volume, cardiac output, oxygen delivery, systemic oxygenation, or tissue oxygenation optimization, alone or in combination. Their relative effectiveness and ranking were assessed using network meta-analysis and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), respectively.Results101 randomized controlled trials investigating GDHT effectiveness in surgical patients were eligible. The most commonly reported outcomes were 30-day mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), and arrhythmia. Mortality was significantly reduced by GDHTs aimed at intravascular volume and cardiac output optimization (OR 0.40; 95% CrI 0.14-0.997; low quality). AKI was significantly reduced by GDHT aimed at intravascular volume optimization (OR 0.26; 95% CrI 0.08-0.71; moderate quality). No GDHT significantly reduced arrhythmia. GDHT aimed at intravascular volume and stroke volume optimization was likely most effective for mortality reduction (SUCRA = 78.8%) while that aimed at intravascular volume, stroke volume, and cardiac output optimization was likely most effective for AKI reduction (SUCRA = 85.4%).ConclusionsDifferent GDHTs likely have different and outcome-dependent effectiveness in surgical patients. GDHTs aimed at intravascular volume, stroke volume, and cardiac output optimization are likely most effective as per the overall evidence.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42020159978.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.