• Stephanie Bennett, Xiaowei Song, Arnold Mitnitski, and Kenneth Rockwood.
• Geriatric Medicine Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
• Age Ageing. 2013 May 1; 42 (3): 372-7.

Backgroundit has been observed that a frailty index (FI) is limited by the value of 0.7. Whether this holds in countries with higher mortality rates is not known.Objectivesto test for and quantify a limit in very old Chinese adults and to relate mortality risk to the FI.Designsecondary analysis of four waves (1998, 2000, 2002 and 2005) of the Chinese Longitudinal Health and Longevity Study (CLHLS).Subjectsa total of 6,300 people from 22 of 31 provinces in China, aged 80-99 years at baseline and followed up to 7 years.Methodsan FI was calculated as the ratio of actual to 38 possible health deficits. Frequency distributions were used to evaluate the limit to the FI. Logistic regression and survival analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between the FI and mortality.Resultsat each wave, a 99% submaximal limit to frailty was observed at FI = 0.7, despite consecutive losses to death. The death rate for those who were healthiest at baseline (i.e. those in whom the baseline FI = 0) increased from 0.18 at the 2-year follow-up to 0.69 by 7 years. At each wave, 100% mortality at 2 years was observed at FI close to 0.67. A baseline FI >0.45 was associated with 100% 7-year mortality.Conclusionsa limit to frailty occurred with FI = 0.7 which was not exceeded at any age or in any wave. There appears to be a demonstrable limit to the number of health problems that people can tolerate.

27 keywords...

hide…