• Aaron C Spaulding, Shalmali Borkar, Osayande Osagiede, Jordan J Cochuyt, Riccardo Lemini, Nolan Otto, and Dorin T Colibaseanu.
• Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224. Email: spaulding.aaron@mayo.edu.
• Am J Manag Care. 2020 Nov 1; 26 (11): e347-e354.

ObjectivesThis study sought to examine the impact of distance traveled from place of residence to surgical facility for elective colorectal surgery on surgical outcomes, length of stay, and complication rate.Study DesignRetrospective study.MethodsPatients with colorectal cancer were identified from the Florida Inpatient Discharge Database. Distance traveled from primary residence to surgical facility was estimated using zip code. After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, multivariate regression models compared bypassed hospitals, the length of stay, and complication rates for patients traveling different distances to receive care.ResultsPatients residing in rural areas and in South (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% CI, 1.55-3.63) and Central Florida (OR, 5.86; 95% CI, 3.86-8.89) were more likely to travel more than 50 miles for treatment. Teaching status of the hospital (OR, 9.99; 95% CI, 6.98-14.31), a hospital's availability of a colorectal surgeon (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.45-2.31), and metastasized cancer (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.17-1.82) influenced the patient's decision to travel farther for treatment. Length of stay was significantly higher for patients traveling farther (P < .0343). However, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications among the groups (those traveling 25-50 miles vs < 25 miles [P = .5766] and those traveling > 50 miles vs < 25 miles [P = .4516]).ConclusionsA greater number of patients travel more than 50 miles to the surgical facility at a later stage of disease. These patients do not significantly differ from those traveling less than 50 miles in their rates of complications; however, they stay longer at the surgical facility.

7 keywords...

hide…