• Suyoung Moon, Jungwon Lee, Hyuckgoo Kim, Jeongeun Kim, Jiseob Kim, and Saeyoung Kim.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 20; 99 (47): e23214.

BackgroundThe serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a novel method that provides lateral chest wall analgesia. There are 2 methods of SAPB; deep and superficial SAPB. Each of these methods has been demonstrated to provide effective perioperative analgesia in thoracic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative hemodynamic and analgesic benefits of deep versus superficial SAPB during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.MethodsWe performed a prospective, randomized, patient/assessor-blinded trial. We included patients who were 20 to 75 years of age and scheduled to undergo VATS lobectomy with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either ultrasound-guided deep SAPB (Group D) or superficial SAPB (Group S). The primary outcome was intraoperative remifentanil consumption. We also recorded intraoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), emergence time, and doses of rescue drugs used to manage hemodynamic instability.ResultsData for 50 patients undergoing 3-port VATS lobectomy were analyzed. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption did not differ significantly between Group D (n = 25, 715.62 ± 320.36 μg) and group S (n = 25, 721.08 ± 294.48 μg) (P = .97). Additionally, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in SBP and HR at any time point, emergence time, or amount of rescue drugs used.ConclusionOur study suggests that the intraoperative analgesic efficacy is similar for deep and superficial SAPB during VATS lobectomy.

28 keywords...

hide…