• Niger J Clin Pract · Nov 2020

    Antibacterial effect of diode laser on different cariogenic bacteria: An In-vitro study.

    • T S Vinothkumar, R Apathsakayan, F M M El-Shamy, H E Homeida, A I M Hommedi, M Y A Safhi, and H A M Alsalhi.
    • Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
    • Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Nov 1; 23 (11): 157815821578-1582.

    AimsThe authors have used an in vitro model to appraise the antimicrobial efficacy of diode lasers with two different power outputs on Streptococcus mutans (SM), Lactobacillus casei (LC), and Actinomyces naeslundii (AN).Methods And MaterialsThe coronal dentin of thirty human mandibular third molars was prepared with four cylindrical cavities left in contact with SM, LC, and AN for 72 h to facilitate bacterial penetration. Diode laser (810 nm for 30 s in two cycles) with 1.5 W (group I), 1 W (group II), and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution for 60 s (group III) was applied on three cavities and the fourth cavity was not subjected to any treatment (control). Similar amounts of dentin debris were collected from the cavity into sterile tubes. The bacterial count was determined by serial dilution and plate count method. Percentage of killing was calculated for comparative analysis.ResultsThe percentage of SM killed after exposure was 73.68 ± 23.37, 51.75 ± 25.45, and 26.78 ± 21.8 in three groups, respectively, (P = 0.002; Kruskal-Wallis) with no significant difference between group I and group II (P = 0.089; Mann-Whitney). The percentage of AN killed after exposure was 37.77 ± 49.52, 22 ± 19.48, and 56.86 ± 23.93 in three groups, respectively, (P = 0.013; Kruskal-Wallis) with significant difference between group II and group III (P = 0.002; Mann-Whitney). The percentage of LC killed after exposure was 51.32 ± 39.07, 36.65 ± 38.48, and 75.41 ± 22.6 in three groups, respectively (P = 0.091; Kruskal-Wallis).ConclusionsDiode lasers exerted antibacterial effect of varying levels against all the three cariogenic bacteria. Although they are recommended as a supplementary antibacterial surface pretreatment technique for efficient removal of cariogenic bacteria, further clinical studies are required to confirm the in vitro findings.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.