• Maya Dewan, Heather Wolfe, Richard Lin, Eileen Ware, Michelle Weiss, Lihai Song, Matthew MacMurchy, Daniela Davis, and Christopher Bonafide.
• Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
• J Hosp Med. 2017 Aug 1; 12 (8): 652-657.

BackgroundPhysiologic monitors generate high rates of alarms in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), yet few are actionable.ObjectiveTo determine the association between a huddle-based intervention focused on reducing unnecessary alarms and the change in individual patients' alarm rates in the 24 hours after huddles.DesignQuasi-experimental study with concurrent and historical controls.SettingA 55-bed PICU.ParticipantsThree hundred low-acuity patients with more than 40 alarms during the 4 hours preceding a safety huddle in the PICU between April 1, 2015, and October 31, 2015.InterventionStructured safety huddle review and discussion of alarm causes and possible monitor parameter adjustments to reduce unnecessary alarms.Main MeasurementsRate of priority alarms per 24 hours occurring for intervention patients as compared with concurrent and historical controls. Balancing measures included unexpected changes in patient acuity and code blue events.ResultsClinicians adjusted alarm parameters in the 5 hours following the huddles in 42% of intervention patients compared with 24% of control patients (𝑃 = .002). The estimate of the effect of the intervention adjusted for age and sex compared with concurrent controls was a reduction of 116 priority alarms (95% confidence interval, 37-194) per 24 hours (𝑃 = .004). There were no unexpected changes in patient acuity or code blue events related to the intervention.ConclusionsIntegrating a data-driven monitor alarm discussion into safety huddles was a safe and effective approach to reducing alarms in low-acuity, highalarm PICU patients.© 2017 Society of Hospital Medicine

16 keywords...

hide…