• C Gassner, F Sommer, B Rubenbauer, A M Keppler, Y Liesaus, W C Prall, C Kammerlander, W Böcker, and J Fürmetz.
• Klinik für Allgemeine, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. christoph.gassner@med.uni-muenchen.de.
• Unfallchirurg. 2021 Jun 1; 124 (6): 473-480.

BackgroundThe care of distal periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) is becoming a major interdisciplinary challenge due to demographic developments. The operative treatment is often performed (depending on the type of fracture) by means of locking plate fixation (LPF), although little data on the clinical outcome exist by now. The aim of the study is to identify risk factors for a poor outcome and increased mortality METHODS: In this retrospective study, 36 cases with distal PFF were examined. Exclusively treatment with LPF were included. Relevant previous illnesses (ASA score, Charlson index), fracture morphology and major complications were recorded as well as 1- and 3- year mortality. The clinical outcome was detected by using the Lysholm score.ResultsThe 1- and 3- year mortality were 9% and 26% - exclusively affecting ASA 3 and 4 patients. The Lysholm Score showed a high variability (65 ± 27 points) with higher values in the ASA 1-2 subgroup (82 vs. 63 points) but independent of fracture type. The preoperative ASA score, the Charlson comorbidity index, and the patient age were determined to be decisive for 3-year mortality.ConclusionThis case series displayed a high absolute mortality even if the rate was slightly lower compared to previously published data. The rate of secondary dislocations, lack of fracture healing or follow-up operations were also low. The LPF therefore appears to be a suitable treatment for fractures with a stable prosthesis. However, there is a high variability in the clinical outcome regardless of the type of fracture and significantly increased mortality rates in previously ill patients.

18 keywords...

hide…