-
Zhonghua nei ke za zhi · Apr 2015
Randomized Controlled Trial[The efficacy and safety of human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue liraglutide in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c > 9].
- Lihui Yan, Shaozhen Wang, Pin Chen, Chen Chen, Zhulin Shao, Xiangjin Xu, and Qin Huang.
- Department of Gastroenterology, Metabolic Disease Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Key Laboratory of Hormones and Development, Ministry of Health, Tianjin 300070, China; Email: yanlihui1981@163.com.
- Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Apr 1; 54 (4): 307-12.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue liraglutide in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > 9%.MethodsThis was an open-labelled, randomized, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial. Newly diagnosed T2DM patients with HbA1c > 9% were enrolled. These patients were treated with metformin with repaglinide and randomized to receive once-daily liraglutide (LIRA, n=25) or the insulin glargine (IGla, n=24) at bedtime. Efficacy and safety were assessed and compared after 18-month treatment.Results(1) Compared with the baseline, patients with LIRA had significantly reduced mean body weight,BMI and waist circumference (P < 0.01), whereas, the above indexes were increased (P < 0.01) in patients treated with IGla. (2) After 18 months of treatment, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour plasma glucose after a 75g oral glucose load (2hPG) and HbA1c were significantly improved in all patients (P < 0.01), with 2hPG, mean blood glucose (MBG), the largest amplitude of glycemic excursions (LAGE), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) were significantly lower in LIRA group than in IGla group (all P < 0.05). (3) HOMA-IR decreased in both groups (P < 0.05). However, ΔI30/ΔG30, AUCCP180 and Matsuda index were only significantly increased in patients treated with LIRA (respectively, 4.88 ± 1.55 vs 7.60±1.91, 9.23 ± 2.66 vs 13.18 ± 2.72, 39.28 ± 20.35 vs 54.64 ± 23.34, all P < 0.01), while HOMA-IR reduced (4.41 ± 1.58 vs 3.52 ± 1.44, P < 0.05). But in IGla group only HOMA-IR was reduced (4.92 ± 1.84 vs 4.57 ± 1.80, P < 0.05). The index of ΔI30/ΔG30, AUCCP180 and Matsuda index in LIRA group are higher than those of indexes in IGla group(respectively, 7.60 ± 1.91 vs 4.18 ± 1.00, 13.18 ± 2.72 vs 10.53 ± 2.68,54.64 ± 23.34 vs 41.65 ± 17.84, all P < 0.05), while HOMA-IR is lower (3.52 ± 1.44 vs 4.57 ± 1.80, P< 0.05). (4) The rate of HbA1c ≤ 6.5% and the dosages of oral anti-diabetic drugs in LIRA group were significantly better than that in IGla group. (5) No significant differences were observed in hypoglycemic episodes and adverse events between two groups.ConclusionIt seems that liraglutide is superior to insulin glargine in newly diagnosed T2DM patients with HbA1c > 9% in improving beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.